Volume 27, Issue 4 (1-2025)                   jha 2025, 27(4): 67-83 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jani S, Mehara M, Khodadad Kashi F, Soleimani Y. Estimation of willingness to pay for the use of monkeypox vaccine in Iran. jha 2025; 27 (4) :67-83
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4413-en.html
1- Department of Economics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran. , s.jani@pnu.ac.ir
2- Department of Economics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Economics, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (66 Views)
Introduction: Given the potential spread of infectious diseases, including monkeypox, conducting studies to ensure the effective implementation of prevention programs is crucial. In this context, understanding the public’s willingness to pay (WTP) for the monkeypox vaccine is a critical priority for public health management. This study estimated WTP for monkeypox vaccine in Iran.
Methods: WTP for the monkeypox vaccine was estimated using the one-and-one-half-bounded (OOHB) dichotomous choice contingent valuation method. The factors influencing willingness to pay were analyzed using an econometric model based on the maximum likelihood estimation method. Data were collected through an online questionnaire administered nationwide in Iran during the summer of 2023. The bid amounts were determined using the Cooper approach (DWEABS) , and the sample size was set at 356 individuals based on the Mitchell and Carson method. Data werer analzed using the R in RStudio software.
Results: The median and mean willingness to pay for the monkeypox vaccine were estimated at 91,000 and 136,000 Iranian Tomans, respectively. In addition, the results indicated that age, importance to health issues, income, education, and disease background significantly influenced the willingness to pay for the monkeypox vaccine.
Conclusion: The estimated willingness to pay for the monkeypox vaccine was 136,000 Tomans (approximately 2.5 USD). Offering subsidies, paticullary with consideration of income diaparities, can encourage a larger segment of the population to receive the monkeypox vaccine.
Full-Text [PDF 1427 kb]   (20 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (6 Views)  
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health Economics
Received: 2024/12/18 | Accepted: 2024/07/15 | Published: 2025/07/27

References
1. Selgelid MJ. Smallpox revisited?. American Journal of Bioethics. 2003 ; 3(1):5-11. doi: [DOI:10.1162/152651603322781620]
2. "WHO Factsheet - Mpox (Monkeypox)". World Health Organization (WHO). 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mpox
3. Guardian Council. The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Available from: https://www.shora-gc.ir/files/fa/news/1398/9/21/4354_236.pdf
4. Pezhoyan J . Public Sector Economics (Costs). Jangal Publications, 8th edition, 2010. p. 129. [In Persian]
5. Harapan H, Wagner AL, Yufika A, Setiawan AM, Anwar S, Wahyuni S. Acceptance and willingness to pay for a hypothetical vaccine against monkeypox viral infection among frontline physicians: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia. Vaccine. 2020;38(43):6800-6. doi: [DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.034]
6. Hong J, Pan B, Jiang HJ, Zhang QM, Xu XW, Jiang H. The willingness of Chinese healthcare workers to receive monkeypox vaccine and its independent predictors: a cross‐sectional survey. Journal of Medical Virology. 2023;95(1):e28294. doi: [DOI:10.1002/jmv.28294]
7. Alarifi AM, Alshahrani NZ, Sah R. Are Saudi healthcare workers willing to receive the monkeypox virus vaccine? evidence from a descriptive-baseline survey. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023;8(8):396. doi: [DOI:10.3390/tropicalmed8080396]
8. Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future; 1989.
9. Cooper JC. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.;24(1):25-40. doi: [DOI:10.1006/jeem.1993.1002]
10. Kjaer T. A review of the discrete choice experiment-with emphasis on its application in health care. Denmark: Syddansk Universitet; 2005. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265363271_A_review_of_the_Discrete_Choice_Experiment-with_Emphasis_on_Its_Application_in_Health_Care
11. Boyle KJ. Contingent valuation in practice. in, PA Champ, KJ Boyle, TC Brown, eds., A primer on nonmarket valuation. 2003. Available from: [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_4]
12. Bishop RC, Heberlein TA. Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1979;61(5):926-30. doi: [DOI:10.2307/3180348]
13. Kanninen BJ. Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics. 1993:138-46. doi: [DOI:10.2307/3146514]
14. Cooper JC, Hanemann M, Signorello G. One-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2002;84(4):742-50.doi: [DOI:10.1162/003465302760556549]
15. Hanemann WM. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 1984;66(3):332-41. doi: [DOI:10.2307/1240800]
16. Seller C, Stoll JR, Chavas JP. Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: a comparison of nonmarket techniques. Land Economics. 1985;61(2):156-75. doi: [DOI:10.2307/3145808]
17. Boyle KJ, Welsh MP, Bishop RC. Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: Comment. Land Economics. 1988;64(1):94-8. doi: [DOI:10.2307/3146613]
18. Krinsky I, Robb AL. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. the review of economics and statistics. 1986 1:715-9. doi: [DOI:10.2307/1924536]
19. Krinsky I, Robb AL. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities: A correction. Review of Economics & Statistics. 1990;72(1):189-90. [DOI:10.2307/1924536]
20. Alberini A, Kahn J. Handbook on contingent valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2006. [DOI:10.4337/9781845427917]
21. Aizaki H, Nakatani T, Sato K. Stated preference methods using R. CRC Press; 2014. [DOI:10.1201/b17292]
22. Aizaki H, Nakatani T, Sato K, Fogarty J. R package DCchoice for dichotomous choice contingent valuation: a contribution to open scientific software and its impact. Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science. 2022 Dec;5(2):871-84. doi: [DOI:10.1007/s42081-022-00171-1]
23. Tran BX, Do LA, Hoang TP, Boyer L, Auquier P, Fond G. Crucial choices in a global health crisis: Revealing the demand and willingness to pay for a hypothetical monkeypox vaccine-the PREVENT study. Journal of Global Health. 2023;13.04033. doi: [DOI:10.7189/jogh.13.04033]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Health Administration

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb