Volume 26, Issue 3 (1-2024)
jha 2024, 26(3): 29-49 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Safari M, Mazroui Nasrabadi E. The Future Study of Service-Based Financing in the Healthcare Supply Chain. jha 2024; 26 (3) :29-49
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4354-en.html
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4354-en.html
1- M.Sc student, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Financial Sciences, Management and Entrepreneurship, University of Kashan, Kashan
2- University of Kashan ,drmazroui@kashanu.ac.ir
2- University of Kashan ,
Abstract: (983 Views)
Introduction: The healthcare sector is a primary driver of a country's growth. In light of recent healthcare crises, adequate financing has gained special importance. This research aims to explore potential futures of service-based financing in the healthcare supply chain.
Methods: This study, applied in nature and employing a mixed-methods approach, was conducted in Iran over four stages from 2021 to 2023. The first stage involved 15 participants, followed by 12 in the subsequent stages. Participants included healthcare supply chain managers and university professors specializing in healthcare management and research. In the first stage, semi-structured interviews, interview guidelines, and thematic analysis were utilized to identify the drivers of the service-based financing chain. The second stage involved a researcher-made questionnaire and the Micmac software to extract the main drivers. In the third stage, an interactive management approach determined the uncertainty of each main driver. Finally, the fourth stage used a researcher-made questionnaire and the ScenarioWizard software to identify consistent scenarios.
Results: The study identified 20 drivers, with 13 deemed as main drivers, leading to 15 consistent scenarios. The results reveal a contradiction: while the improvement and differentiation of services (coupled with inflation) may increase the cost of services, leading to reduced accessibility for some, failure to improve healthcare services could result in capital flight and inadequate treatment for new diseases.
Conclusion: To resolve this contradiction, two approaches for the healthcare sector can be envisioned: a) customer segmentation based on financial capacity and required services, and b) alternative financing methods. Approach "a" potentially increases social inequality by providing different services based on financial ability. Approach "b", relying on inconsistent income sources like charity, leaves the government's role in financing ambiguous. Consequently, approach "a", supplemented with governmental support for vulnerable groups, appears more viable.
Methods: This study, applied in nature and employing a mixed-methods approach, was conducted in Iran over four stages from 2021 to 2023. The first stage involved 15 participants, followed by 12 in the subsequent stages. Participants included healthcare supply chain managers and university professors specializing in healthcare management and research. In the first stage, semi-structured interviews, interview guidelines, and thematic analysis were utilized to identify the drivers of the service-based financing chain. The second stage involved a researcher-made questionnaire and the Micmac software to extract the main drivers. In the third stage, an interactive management approach determined the uncertainty of each main driver. Finally, the fourth stage used a researcher-made questionnaire and the ScenarioWizard software to identify consistent scenarios.
Results: The study identified 20 drivers, with 13 deemed as main drivers, leading to 15 consistent scenarios. The results reveal a contradiction: while the improvement and differentiation of services (coupled with inflation) may increase the cost of services, leading to reduced accessibility for some, failure to improve healthcare services could result in capital flight and inadequate treatment for new diseases.
Conclusion: To resolve this contradiction, two approaches for the healthcare sector can be envisioned: a) customer segmentation based on financial capacity and required services, and b) alternative financing methods. Approach "a" potentially increases social inequality by providing different services based on financial ability. Approach "b", relying on inconsistent income sources like charity, leaves the government's role in financing ambiguous. Consequently, approach "a", supplemented with governmental support for vulnerable groups, appears more viable.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Health Services Management
Received: 2023/06/17 | Accepted: 2023/09/20 | Published: 2024/03/3
Received: 2023/06/17 | Accepted: 2023/09/20 | Published: 2024/03/3
References
1. Chacha WR, Shadrack KS. Public Health Financing Policy: The Case of Baringo County-Kenya. Int J Res Sci Innov Appl Sci. 2020;5(8):600-604.
2. Malakoane B, Heunis JC, Chikobvu P, Kigozi NG, Kruger WH. Public health system challenges in the Free State, South Africa: a situation appraisal to inform health system strengthening. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:1-14. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4862-y. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4862-y]
3. Safonov Y, Borshch V, Rogachevskyi O. Theoretical Foundations of Competitiveness Management of Health Care Institutions. Balt J Econ Stud. 2022;8(4):131-138. Available from: https://repo.odmu.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/12301. [DOI:10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-4-131-138]
4. Beleya P, Veerappan G, DingW J, Tan J. Challenges in attaining sustainable development goals in Port Klang: Port management perspective. Int J Supply Chain Manag. 2020;9(1):349-355.
5. Hailu YM, editor. Regulating Domestic Financing to Foreign Investment in Ethiopia [Internet]. Addis Ababa University; 2021 [cited 2024 Jan 1]. Available from: https://etelsa.org/resources/thesis/1b789982-25e8-11ed-9578-0a0027000027/1bfa6c84-38de-11ed-ada3-0a0027000027.pdf
6. Moşteanu N, Fathi BM. Financial digitalization and its implication on jobs market structure. Bus Manag Rev. 2020;11(1):305-311. doi: 10.24052/BMR/V11NU01/ART-32. [DOI:10.24052/BMR/V11NU01/ART-32]
7. Take S, Mane KD, Bendre AT, Vidhate P. A Blockchain-Based Approach for Drug Traceability in Healthcare Supply Chain. IEEE Access. 2023;9:9728-9743. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049920. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3049920]
8. Phiri WW, Chitangala FM. Effects of Direct Healthcare Financing on Strategic Health Indicators in Rural Health Facilities of Chikankata District of Zambia: 2014-2018. J Prev Rehabil Med. 2021;3(1):104-113.
9. Das T, Narayanan R, Rao GN. Health Financing and Sustainability. In: Das T, Nayar PD, editors. South-East Asia Eye Health Systems, Practices, and Challenges. Springer; 2021. p. 91-101. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-3787-2_6. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-16-3787-2_6]
10. Tandon A, Reddy KS. Redistribution and the health financing transition. J Glob Health. 2021;11. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.16001. [DOI:10.7189/jogh.11.16001]
11. Olayiwola SO, Olusanya SO. Health Financing and Economic Growth in Nigeria. LAFIA IJEMS. 2021;6(2):146-163.
12. Kumar K. A public-private partnership based model for regulating out-of-pocket expenditures to strengthen primary care system. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022;37(5):2964-2991. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3535. [DOI:10.1002/hpm.3535]
13. Aregbeshola BS, Khan SM. Out-of-pocket health-care spending and its determinants among households in Nigeria: a national study. J Public Health. 2021;29:931-942. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01199-x. [DOI:10.1007/s10389-020-01199-x]
14. Duckett S, Stobart A, Lin L. Not so universal: how to reduce out-of-pocket healthcare payments. Grattan Institute; 2022.
15. Rezaei S, Woldemichael A, Ebrahimi M, Ahmadi S. Trend and status of out-of-pocket payments for healthcare in Iran: equity and catastrophic effect. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2020;95:1-8. doi: 10.1186/s42506-020-00055-w. [DOI:10.1186/s42506-020-00055-w]
16. Heidari Orejlo P, Vahdat S, Soltani H. Presentation of Health Financing System Model with Emphasis on Structural, Contextual, Instrumental, and Content Factors. J Healthc Manag. 2020;11(35):87-99. [In Persian].
17. Tohidi M, Shamaeezade A, Azadi Ahmadabadi M. Investigation and analysis of the use of sukuk to finance the Iranian health system: Case study of health care providers. Journal of Securities Exchange. 2021;14(53):160-190. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/959292/en. [In Persian].
18. Eisavi M, Moayedfard A. Budget Trends and Financing Methods of the Health Sector in Iran: an Operational Proposal. J Health Adm. 2022;24(4):71-83. [In Persian]. [DOI:10.52547/jha.24.4.71]
19. Mosadeghrad AM, Khodayari R, Abbasi M, Karimi F. Sustainable Financing Strategies for the Iranian Health System: A Scoping Review. J Sch Publ Health Inst Publ Health Res. 2021;19(2):137-156. [In Persian].
20. Ramezanian M, Haghdoost AA, Mehrolhassani MH, Abolhallaje M, Dehnavieh R, Poursheikhali A. Effective factors and drivers of Iran's health care financing system. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:104. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.104. [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.34.104]
21. Chang AY, Cowling K, Micah AE, Chapin A, Chen CS, Ikilezi G, Qorbani M, et al. Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995-2050. Lancet. 2019;393(10187):2233-2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30841-4]
22. Tambor M, Klich J, Domagała A. Financing healthcare in central and eastern European countries: how far are we from universal health coverage? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1382. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041382. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18041382]
23. Huseynova S. Financing Healthcare System in Azerbaijan and Future Perspectives of Implementation Compulsory Health Insurance Mechanism. Int J Innov Tech Econ. 2020;5(32). doi: 10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30122020/7226. [DOI:10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30122020/7226]
24. Jabbari A, Zakeri A, Saghafi F, Hadian M. Iranian health financing system challenges to promote health outcomes: Qualitative study. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12(1):149. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_507_22.
25. Rezaei FM, Ziaaddini M, Hosseinipour SMR. Designing a health financing model in the Ministry of Health and Medical Education with a donors social participation approach. J Torbat Heydariyeh Univ Med Sci. 2021;9(1):35-44. [In Persian].
26. Mekuria GA, Eskinder EA. The financial burden of out of pocket payments on medicines among households in Ethiopia: analysis of trends and contributing factors. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):1-12. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15751-3. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-15751-3]
27. Islam S. Health for all or health for some? Healthcare provisions and financing in Bangladesh and India: A comparative analysis. Harv Asia Q. 2012;14.4:74-83. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2215483.
28. Nanda M, Rajesh S. A comprehensive examination of the economic impact of out-of-pocket health expenditures in India. Health Pol Plann. 2023;38(8):926-938. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad050. [DOI:10.1093/heapol/czad050]
29. Mustafa ÖZER. Socioeconomic Determinants of Out-Of-Pocket Health Care Expenditures in Turkey. Open J Soc Sci. 2023;7(2):1196-1211. doi: 10.25295/fsecon.1239845. [DOI:10.25295/fsecon.1239845]
30. Cesar J, Cutipa E, Rolando Cáceres Quenta, Beatriz N, Betsy Quispe Quispe, Adderly Mamani Flores, et al. Determinants of Out-of-Pocket Health Spending in Households in Peru in the Times of the Pandemic (COVID-19). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;20(18):6759. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20186759. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph20186759]
31. Sangar S, Dutt V, Thakur R. Comparative assessment of economic burden of disease in relation to out of pocket expenditure. Front Public Health. 2019;7:9. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00009. [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00009]
32. Kumar K, Singh A, Kumar S, Ram F, Singh A, Ram U, et al. Socio-Economic Differentials in Impoverishment Effects of Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure in China and India: Evidence from WHO SAGE. PLOS ONE. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0135051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135051. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0135051]
33. Tyan I, Guevara-Plaza A, Yagüe MI. The benefits of blockchain technology for medical t tourism. Sustainability. 2021;13(22):12448. doi: 10.3390/su132212448. [DOI:10.3390/su132212448]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Site Keywords
Health, Administration, Scientific Article, Iran University of Medical Sciences,
