Volume 26, Issue 2 (6-2023)                   jha 2023, 26(2): 33-50 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Talebian A, Okhovati M, Arshadi H, Hayati R, Tabrizi R, Karimimoghadam Z. Investigating and comparing citation indicators and altmetrics of articles in the field of addiction to opioids by using the PlumX tool. jha 2023; 26 (2) :33-50
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4287-en.html
1- Assistant Professor ,Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences, kerman university of medical sciences, Kerman
2- Associate Professor ,Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman
3- Ph.D Student , Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences, kerman university of medical sciences, Kerman
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa
5- Assistant Professor, Noncommunicable diseases reseach center, Fasa university of medical sciences, Fasa
6- M.Sc ,Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences, kerman university of medical sciences, Kerman , z.karimimoghadam@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1076 Views)
Introduction: One of the methods for evaluating scientific productions that has long received attention is citation analysis. Considering the limitations of citation analysis and the proliferation of social media and its importance in the dissemination of research results, there seems to be a need for new indicators, called altmetrics, in addition to the traditional indicators for research evaluation. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to investigate the status of articles in the field of opioid addiction using bibliometric  indicators and altmetrics, as well as to determine the relationship between the citation performance and the altmetrics performance of articles in this field.
Methods: This study is a descriptive-analytical study of an applied type, which was carried out using bibliometric and altmetrics methods. The research population includes 16,803 titles of articles in the field of opioid addiction indexed by the Scopus database from the beginning to 2022. The Scopus database and PlumX tool were used for data collection, and Excel and SPSS were used for data analysis.
Results: 80.6% of the studied publications were cited. 95% of these publications were mentioned at least once in one of the social media. The results of the research show that statistically, there is a significant and positive relationship between the number of citations and all the altmetrics.
Conclusion: Considering the positive correlation between citation and altmetrics in this study, it can be said that social media can have a positive impact on the number of citation of scientific articles. Therefore, researchers in the field of opioid addiction can use social media and share their works in various social media to get citations for their scientific activities.
Full-Text [PDF 1424 kb]   (374 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Medical Librarianship and Information Science
Received: 2023/04/21 | Accepted: 2023/06/21 | Published: 2023/11/28

References
1. Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics. scientometrics. 2014;98:1131-43. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2]
2. Erfanmanesh M. The presence of Iranian information science and library science articles in social media: An altmetric study. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2017;32(2):349-73. [In Persian]
3. Haustein S, Siebenlist T. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage. J Informetr. 2011;5(3):446-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.002]
4. Mohammadi E, Thelwall M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(8):1627-38. [DOI:10.1002/asi.23071]
5. Schloegl C, Stock WG. Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German‐language LIS journals-Citation analysis versus reader survey. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2004;55(13):1155-68. [DOI:10.1002/asi.20070]
6. Alijani R, Sadeghian N. Scientometrics and its indicators for surgical specialists and researchers. Iranian Journal of Surgery. 2018;26(1):63-70. [In Persian]
7. Sotudeh H, Ravaei M, Mirzabegi M. Comparing the opportunities provided by altmetrics and citation analysis for research evaluation. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2018;34(1):113-38. [In Persian]
8. Serati Shirazi M, Goltaji M. An altmetric study on scientific articles of "Health Literacy" in social media. Payesh. 2018;17(3):249-56. [In Persian]
9. Bahmanabadi A. Altmetrics: Social media in the service of research effectiveness evaluation. Agriculture information science and technology. 2020;3(5):1-10. [In Persian]
10. About PlumX Metrics [Internet]. 2023. Available from: http://plumanalytics.com/learn/about-metrics/.
11. Ehtesham H, Sadeghi H, Vahedi Darmian F, Amiri O. Evaluation of altmetrics indicators of Birjand university of medical sciences articles listed on the Scopus database by using the PlumX Tool: A scientometric study. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2019;26(4):343-52. [In Persian] [DOI:10.32592/JBirjandUnivMedSci.2019.26.4.106]
12. Ram S, Shalini. Alternative metrices for assessing research impact PlumX tool to showcase academic profile of himachal pradesh university. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS); 2018 Feb 21-23; Noida, India. IEEE; 2018. [DOI:10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485248]
13. Torres-Salinas D, Robinson-Garcia N, Gorraiz J. Filling the citation gap: Measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX. Scientometrics. 2017;113:1371-84. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-017-2539-z]
14. Batooli H, Batooli Z. Evaluating the impact of the scientific output of researchers using PlumX tools: A case study of the research institute of forests and rangelands. Scientometrics Research Journal. 2021;7(2):23-50. [In Persian]
15. Bashiri T, Erfanmanesh MA, Asnafi A. Do highly-cited articles from Iran in the field of medical sciences attract high attentions in social media? Health Information Management. 2018;15(2):90-6. [In Persian]
16. Khammarnia M, Peyvand M. The reasons of return to drug addiction and suggested solutions among the people referring to rehabilitation centers: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2018;17(6):523-38. [In Persian]
17. Makizadeh F, Hazeri A. Drawing map of articles related to addiction using social network analysis in Medline database. Research on Addiction. 2017;11(41):65-84. [In Persian]
18. Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Lariviere V, Gingras Y, Carr L, Brody T, et al. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):1-12. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636]
19. Sotudeh H, Khoshian N. Gender, web presence and scientific productivity in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics. 2014;99:717-36. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-014-1234-6]
20. Gaule P, Maystre N. Getting cited: Does open access help? Res Pol. 2011;40(10):1332-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025]
21. Sotudeh H, Mazarei Z, Mirzabeigi M. The Relationship between citation-based indicators and citeulike bookmarks in information & library science articles during 2004 - 2012. Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management. 2015;30(4):939-63. [In Persian]
22. Ortega J-L. Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication. Information professional. 2020;29(1). 1-23. [DOI:10.3145/epi.2020.ene.07]
23. Holmberg KJ. Altmetrics for information professionals. USA: Chandos Publishing; 2015.
24. Sedighi M. The role of social media in assessing the impact of research (Case study: The field of scientometrics). Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2019;34(2):765-92. [In Persian]
25. Aliahmad A, Ghazi Mirsaeid J, Ehtesham H. The status of altmerics of the articles published in Iranian cardiovascular journals indexed in Scopus by using the PlumX during 2014-2016. Iranian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2019;8(1):48-55. [In Persian]
26. Maflahi N, Thelwall M. When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus M endeley for LIS journals. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(1):191-9. [DOI:10.1002/asi.23369]
27. Erfanmanesh MA, Nojavan F. Qualitative and quantitative status and international visibility of Iranian journals indexed in journal citation reports. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2016;32(1):51-73. [In Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Health Administration

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb