1. Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating altmetrics. scientometrics. 2014;98:1131-43. [
DOI:10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2]
2. Erfanmanesh M. The presence of Iranian information science and library science articles in social media: An altmetric study. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2017;32(2):349-73. [In Persian]
3. Haustein S, Siebenlist T. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usage. J Informetr. 2011;5(3):446-57. [
DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.002]
4. Mohammadi E, Thelwall M. Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(8):1627-38. [
DOI:10.1002/asi.23071]
5. Schloegl C, Stock WG. Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German‐language LIS journals-Citation analysis versus reader survey. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2004;55(13):1155-68. [
DOI:10.1002/asi.20070]
6. Alijani R, Sadeghian N. Scientometrics and its indicators for surgical specialists and researchers. Iranian Journal of Surgery. 2018;26(1):63-70. [In Persian]
7. Sotudeh H, Ravaei M, Mirzabegi M. Comparing the opportunities provided by altmetrics and citation analysis for research evaluation. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2018;34(1):113-38. [In Persian]
8. Serati Shirazi M, Goltaji M. An altmetric study on scientific articles of "Health Literacy" in social media. Payesh. 2018;17(3):249-56. [In Persian]
9. Bahmanabadi A. Altmetrics: Social media in the service of research effectiveness evaluation. Agriculture information science and technology. 2020;3(5):1-10. [In Persian]
10. About PlumX Metrics [Internet]. 2023. Available from: http://plumanalytics.com/learn/about-metrics/.
11. Ehtesham H, Sadeghi H, Vahedi Darmian F, Amiri O. Evaluation of altmetrics indicators of Birjand university of medical sciences articles listed on the Scopus database by using the PlumX Tool: A scientometric study. Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. 2019;26(4):343-52. [In Persian] [
DOI:10.32592/JBirjandUnivMedSci.2019.26.4.106]
12. Ram S, Shalini. Alternative metrices for assessing research impact PlumX tool to showcase academic profile of himachal pradesh university. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS); 2018 Feb 21-23; Noida, India. IEEE; 2018. [
DOI:10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485248]
13. Torres-Salinas D, Robinson-Garcia N, Gorraiz J. Filling the citation gap: Measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX. Scientometrics. 2017;113:1371-84. [
DOI:10.1007/s11192-017-2539-z]
14. Batooli H, Batooli Z. Evaluating the impact of the scientific output of researchers using PlumX tools: A case study of the research institute of forests and rangelands. Scientometrics Research Journal. 2021;7(2):23-50. [In Persian]
15. Bashiri T, Erfanmanesh MA, Asnafi A. Do highly-cited articles from Iran in the field of medical sciences attract high attentions in social media? Health Information Management. 2018;15(2):90-6. [In Persian]
16. Khammarnia M, Peyvand M. The reasons of return to drug addiction and suggested solutions among the people referring to rehabilitation centers: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2018;17(6):523-38. [In Persian]
17. Makizadeh F, Hazeri A. Drawing map of articles related to addiction using social network analysis in Medline database. Research on Addiction. 2017;11(41):65-84. [In Persian]
18. Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Lariviere V, Gingras Y, Carr L, Brody T, et al. Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):1-12. [
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636]
19. Sotudeh H, Khoshian N. Gender, web presence and scientific productivity in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics. 2014;99:717-36. [
DOI:10.1007/s11192-014-1234-6]
20. Gaule P, Maystre N. Getting cited: Does open access help? Res Pol. 2011;40(10):1332-8. [
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.025]
21. Sotudeh H, Mazarei Z, Mirzabeigi M. The Relationship between citation-based indicators and citeulike bookmarks in information & library science articles during 2004 - 2012. Iranian Journal of Information Processing Management. 2015;30(4):939-63. [In Persian]
22. Ortega J-L. Altmetrics data providers: A meta-analysis review of the coverage of metrics and publication. Information professional. 2020;29(1). 1-23. [
DOI:10.3145/epi.2020.ene.07]
23. Holmberg KJ. Altmetrics for information professionals. USA: Chandos Publishing; 2015.
24. Sedighi M. The role of social media in assessing the impact of research (Case study: The field of scientometrics). Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2019;34(2):765-92. [In Persian]
25. Aliahmad A, Ghazi Mirsaeid J, Ehtesham H. The status of altmerics of the articles published in Iranian cardiovascular journals indexed in Scopus by using the PlumX during 2014-2016. Iranian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2019;8(1):48-55. [In Persian]
26. Maflahi N, Thelwall M. When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? Scopus versus M endeley for LIS journals. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(1):191-9. [
DOI:10.1002/asi.23369]
27. Erfanmanesh MA, Nojavan F. Qualitative and quantitative status and international visibility of Iranian journals indexed in journal citation reports. Iran J Inf Process Manag. 2016;32(1):51-73. [In Persian]