Volume 25, Issue 1 (3-2022)
jha 2022, 25(1): 24-34 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abdollahi L, Sheini Jaberi P, Rokhafrooz D. The effect of using SBAR model in shift handover on patient and nurse satisfaction in the emergency department. jha 2022; 25 (1) :24-34
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3863-en.html
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3863-en.html
1- MS.c Student, Nursing & midwifery school, Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
2- Lecturer, Nursing Care Research Center in Chronic Diseases, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, Nursing Care Research Center in Chronic Diseases, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Iran. ,rokhafroz@ajums.ac.ir
2- Lecturer, Nursing Care Research Center in Chronic Diseases, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, Nursing Care Research Center in Chronic Diseases, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Iran. ,
Abstract: (2760 Views)
Introduction:One of the communication models that improves communication between the care team, reduces errors, and increases the quality of care is the SBAR method. The aim of this paper was to determine the effect of using the SBAR model in shift handover on patient and nurse satisfaction.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the emergency department of Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz, 2020. According to the statistical formula, 70 shift handover positions (in control and experimental groups) were selected based on inclusion criteria. First, the control group was randomly selected and, after training the SBAR model, the experimental group was randomly selected. Shift handover was performed routinely in the control group, but it was based on the SBAR model in the test group. Data were collected using demographic, nurse, and patient satisfaction questionnaires and a researcher-made shift handover checklist. Data were analyzed by an independent t-test, a paired t-test, and a chi-2.
Results: The findings showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients in terms of age, length of hospital stays, gender, marriage, employment, education, and type of disease (p<0.05). The results of the paired t-test showed that nurses' satisfaction increased significantly after the intervention. Furthermore, the satisfaction of patients in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group.
Conclusion: The present study showed the importance of standardizing the shift handover process. It is possible to increase the quality of care and increase the satisfaction of nurses and patients by training and using the SBAR method in shift handover.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted in the emergency department of Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz, 2020. According to the statistical formula, 70 shift handover positions (in control and experimental groups) were selected based on inclusion criteria. First, the control group was randomly selected and, after training the SBAR model, the experimental group was randomly selected. Shift handover was performed routinely in the control group, but it was based on the SBAR model in the test group. Data were collected using demographic, nurse, and patient satisfaction questionnaires and a researcher-made shift handover checklist. Data were analyzed by an independent t-test, a paired t-test, and a chi-2.
Results: The findings showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients in terms of age, length of hospital stays, gender, marriage, employment, education, and type of disease (p<0.05). The results of the paired t-test showed that nurses' satisfaction increased significantly after the intervention. Furthermore, the satisfaction of patients in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group.
Conclusion: The present study showed the importance of standardizing the shift handover process. It is possible to increase the quality of care and increase the satisfaction of nurses and patients by training and using the SBAR method in shift handover.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Health Information Management
Received: 2021/11/17 | Accepted: 2022/03/16 | Published: 2022/05/23
Received: 2021/11/17 | Accepted: 2022/03/16 | Published: 2022/05/23
References
1. Smith CJ, Buzalko RJ, Anderson N, Michalski J, Warchol J, Ducey S, et al. Evaluation of a novel handoff communication strategy for patients admitted from the emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):372-9. [DOI:10.5811/westjem.2017.9.35121]
2. Zhu W, Patterson BW, Smith M, Rifleman AC, Carayon P, Li J. A markov chain model for transient analysis of handoff process in emergency departments. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2020 Jul;5(3):4360-7. [DOI:10.1109/LRA.2020.2996066]
3. Dahlquist RT, Reyner K, Robinson RD, Farzad A, Laureano-Phillips J, Garrett JS, et al. Standardized reporting system use during handoffs reduces patient length of stay in the emergency department. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(5):445-51. [DOI:10.14740/jocmr3375w]
4. Toghian Chaharsoughi N, Ahrari Sh, Alikhah Sh. Comparison the effect of teaching of SBAR technique with role play and lecturing on communication skill of nurses. J Caring Sci. 2014;3(2):141-7.
5. kamali m, Sheikhtaheri A. Documenting nursing reports using speech recognition technology: Benefits, barriers, challenges and facilitators. Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics. 2018;5(1):70-82. [In Persian]
6. Tobiano G, Bucknall T, Sladdin I, Whitty JA, Chaboyer W. Patient participation in nursing bedside handover: A systematic mixed-methods review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;77:243-58. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.014]
7. Baghaei R, PourRashid S, Khalkhali HR. The effect of using SBAR model in nursing handoff on communication dimension of nursing care from the patients' view. Nursing and Midwifery Journal. 2016;14(6):562-70. [In Persian]
8. Kazemi M, Sanagoo A, joubari L, Vakili MA. The effect of delivery nursing shift at bedside with patient's partnership on patients' satisfaction and nurses' satisfaction , clinical trial, quasi-experimental study. Nursing and Midwifery Journal. 2016;14(5):426-36. [In Persian]
9. Vazin A, Delfani S. Medication errors in an internal intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital: A direct observation study. Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(6):425-32.
10. Salehi Sh, Zarea K, Akhlagh Mohammadi A. Patient handover process problems between emergency medical service personnel and emergency department nurses. Iranian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;4(1):27-34. [In Persian]
11. Achrekar MS, Murthy V, Kanan S, Shetty R, Nair M, Khattry N. Introduction of situation, background, assessment, recommendation into nursing practice: A prospective study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2016;3(1):45-50. [DOI:10.4103/2347-5625.178171]
12. Mardis T, Mardis M, Davis J, Justice EM, Riley Holdinsky S, Donnelly J, et al. Bedside shift-to-shift handoffs: A systematic review of the literature. J Nurs Care Qual. 2016;31(1):54-60. [DOI:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000142]
13. Sherman J, Sand-Jecklin K, Johnson J. Investigating bedside nursing report: A synthesis of the literature. Medsurg Nurs. 2013;22(5):308-12.
14. Gregory S, Tan D, Tilrico M, Edwardson N, Gamm L. Bedside shift reports: What does the evidence say? J Nurs Adm. 2014;44(10):541-5. [DOI:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000115]
15. Maxson PM, Derby KM, Wrobleski DM, Foss DM. Bedside nurse-to-nurse handoff promotes patient safety. Medsurg Nurs. 2012;21(3):140-4.
16. Miles LW, Mabey L, Leggett S, Stansfield K. Teaching communication and therapeutic relationship skills to baccalaureate nursing students: A peer mentorship simulation approach. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2014;52(10):34-41. [DOI:10.3928/02793695-20140829-01]
17. Friesen MA, White SV, Byers JF. Handoffs: Implications for nurses. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.
18. Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: The critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:i85-90. [DOI:10.1136/qshc.2004.010033]
19. Karmila R, Handiyani H, Rachmi SF. Factors relating to nurse satisfaction with communication during the bedside handover. Enferm Clin. 2019;29:640-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.098]
20. Specchia ML, Cozzolino MR, Carini E, Di Pilla A, Galletti C, Ricciardi W, et al. Leadership styles and nurses' job satisfaction. Results of a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb;18(4):1-15. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18041552]
21. De Simone S, Planta A, Cicotto G. The role of job satisfaction, work engagement, self-efficacy and agentic capacities on nurses' turnover intention and patient satisfaction. Appl Nurs Res. 2018;39:130-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.004]
22. Farghaly M, Kamal A, El-Setouhy M, Hirshon JM, El-Shinawi M. Patient satisfaction with a tertiary hospital in Egypt using a HCAHPS-derived survey. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Oct;14:3053-60. [DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S317322]
23. Bayrami R, Rezazadeh A, Ebrahimipour H. Challenges in emergency departments in teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study. Journal of Hospital. 2017;16(1):63-72. [In Persian]
24. Ting WH, Peng FS, Lin HH, Hsiao SM. The impact of situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) on safety attitudes in the obstetrics department. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;56(2):171-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.021]
25. Campbell D, Dontje K. Implementing bedside handoff in the emergency department: A practice improvement project. J Emerg Nurs. 2019 Mar;45(2):149-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2018.09.007]
26. Muller M, Jurgens J, Redaelli M, Klingberg K, Hautz WE, Stock S. Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):1-10. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202]
27. Usher R, Cronin SN, York NL. Evaluating the influence of a standardized bedside handoff process in a medical-surgical unit. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2018;49(4):157-63. [DOI:10.3928/00220124-20180320-05]
28. Dalky HF, Al-Jaradeen RS, AbuAlRrub RF. Evaluation of the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation handover tool in improving communication and satisfaction among jordanian nurses working in intensive care units. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2020;39(6):339-47. [DOI:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000441]
29. Abela-Dimech F, Vuksic O. Improving the practice of handover for psychiatric inpatient nursing staff. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018;32(5):729-36. [DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2018.04.004]
30. Ruhomauly Z, Betts K, Jayne-Coupe K, Karanfilian L, Szekely M, Relwani A, et al. Improving the quality of handover: Implementing SBAR. Future Healthc J. 2019;6:54. [DOI:10.7861/futurehealth.6-2-s54]
31. Ghosh S, Ramamoorthy L, Pottakat B. Impact of structured clinical handover protocol on communication and patient satisfaction. J Patient Exp. 2021;8:1-6. [DOI:10.1177/2374373521997733]
32. Ng JHY, Luk BHK. Patient satisfaction: Concept analysis in the healthcare context. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(4):790-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.013]
33. Karaca A, Durna Z. Patient satisfaction with the quality of nursing care. Nurs Open. 2019;6(2):535-45. [DOI:10.1002/nop2.237]
34. Blom L, Petersson P, Hagell P, Westergren A. The situation, background, assessment and recommendation (SBAR) model for communication between health care professionals: A clinical intervention pilot study. Int J Caring Sci. 2015;8(3):530-5.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Site Keywords
Health, Administration, Scientific Article, Iran University of Medical Sciences,
