Volume 23, Issue 4 (1-2021)
jha 2021, 23(4): 20-29 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zargham Boroujeni H, Taghva M R, Mahmoodzadeh S M, Maleki R. Infrastructure Management of Medical tourism facilitator firms in Iran. jha 2021; 23 (4) :20-29
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3377-en.html
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3377-en.html
1- Associate Professor, School of Management and accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran. , hzargham@gmail.com
2- Associate Professor, School of Management and accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, School of Management and accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran.
4- Ph.D Student, School of Management and accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, School of Management and accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, School of Management and accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran.
4- Ph.D Student, School of Management and accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i university, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (2378 Views)
Introduction: Medical tourism facilitator firms are the firms which act as intermediaries between suppliers of medical tourism and the patients. In order to have efficient and sufficient outcome, these firms need a well-organized infrastructure. In this research, we investigated the infrastructure management indicators of medical tourism facilitator firms in Iran.
Methods: This research was conducted by using a two-step quantitative method: the Delphi technique and distribution of a structured questionnaire. Statistical population for the first data collection step consisted of the experts in medical tourism and e-business. The second statistical population was medical tourism facilitator firms. The data were analysed using the structural equation modelling (SEM).
Results: The infrastructure management for a Medical tourism facilitator firm included the following five factors: activity configuration, network partner, capabilities, internal (mission, strategy and structure) and external (government, competitors and technology) factors. Activity configurations of a firm, included Collaboration platforms, Virtual communities and Value-chain integrators as main activities of an Medical tourism facilitator firm firm. By examining the network partner factor, it became prominent that insurance companies must be considered more although they face limitations due to sanctions. Capability include facilities in medical and tourism segment, access to database of hospitals and physicians. Considering the internal factors mission, structures and strategy of the firm in the context of planning, their target segment, the firm’s human resources and IT structure of the firm should be developed. The government affects Medical tourism facilitator firm firms by making rules and regulations in the context of visa issuance, having relationship with medical tourism target countries, investing and supporting medical tourism system. The internal and external competitors should be monitored wisely for activities, partners, services, prices and the type of provided services. Technology is towards e-health and health applications and platform to provide required data and information for patients of MTF firms as well.
Conclusion: To manage infrastructure of an MTF firm, it is necessary to consider activity configuration, network partner, capabilities, internal and external factors comprehensively, as mentioned in this paper. Designing a platform between facilitators and partners as well as facilitators and patients is recommended.
Methods: This research was conducted by using a two-step quantitative method: the Delphi technique and distribution of a structured questionnaire. Statistical population for the first data collection step consisted of the experts in medical tourism and e-business. The second statistical population was medical tourism facilitator firms. The data were analysed using the structural equation modelling (SEM).
Results: The infrastructure management for a Medical tourism facilitator firm included the following five factors: activity configuration, network partner, capabilities, internal (mission, strategy and structure) and external (government, competitors and technology) factors. Activity configurations of a firm, included Collaboration platforms, Virtual communities and Value-chain integrators as main activities of an Medical tourism facilitator firm firm. By examining the network partner factor, it became prominent that insurance companies must be considered more although they face limitations due to sanctions. Capability include facilities in medical and tourism segment, access to database of hospitals and physicians. Considering the internal factors mission, structures and strategy of the firm in the context of planning, their target segment, the firm’s human resources and IT structure of the firm should be developed. The government affects Medical tourism facilitator firm firms by making rules and regulations in the context of visa issuance, having relationship with medical tourism target countries, investing and supporting medical tourism system. The internal and external competitors should be monitored wisely for activities, partners, services, prices and the type of provided services. Technology is towards e-health and health applications and platform to provide required data and information for patients of MTF firms as well.
Conclusion: To manage infrastructure of an MTF firm, it is necessary to consider activity configuration, network partner, capabilities, internal and external factors comprehensively, as mentioned in this paper. Designing a platform between facilitators and partners as well as facilitators and patients is recommended.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Health Services Management
Received: 2020/10/23 | Accepted: 2020/12/20 | Published: 2021/01/4
Received: 2020/10/23 | Accepted: 2020/12/20 | Published: 2021/01/4
References
1. Reddy SG. Medical tourism in India: An exploratory study [PhD thesis]. Manhattan: Kansas State University; 2013.
2. Wendt K. Medical Tourism: Trends and Opportunities [MA Thesis] . Las vegas: University of Nevada; 2012
3. Skountridaki L.Barriers to business relations between medical tourism facilitators and medical professionals. Tourism Management . 2017; 59: 254-66. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2016.07.008]
4. Osterwalder A. The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach [PhD thesis]. Lausanne: University de lausanne.2004.
5. The Statement of second ECCO Health tourism conference [internet].2019. Tehran:[Updated 11/2020; Cited 2019-06-20]; Available from: http://otaghiranonline.ir/news/29149. [In Persian]
6. The establishment regulations of Medical tourism facilitator firms [ internet]. Tehran: Ministry of health and medical education; [Updated 11-2020; Cited 2019-06-21]; Available from:https://behdasht.gov.ir [In Persian].
7. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd Ed. New York:The Guilford Press;2011.
8. Tenenhaus M.; Amato S.; Esposito Vinzi, V. A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling, In Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, Bari, Italy, 9-11 June 2004; CLEUP: Padova, Italy, 2004; pp. 739-742.
9. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. An e-Business Model Ontology for Modeling e-Business. Procedding of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, e-Reality: Constructing the e-Economy. 2002 Jun 15-17; Bled: Slovenia.
10. Timmers P. Business Models for Electronic Markets. Electronic Markets.1998;8(2):3-8. [DOI:10.1080/10196789800000016]
11. Hyder AS ,RydbackM, Borg E, Osarenkhoe A. Medical tourism in emerging markets: The role of trust, networks, and word-of-mouth. Health Marketing Quarterly, 2019;36(3):1-17 [DOI:10.1080/07359683.2019.1618008]
12. Baum T, Szivas E. HRD in tourism: A role for government? Tourism Management. 2008;29(4);783-794. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.09.002]
13. Alt R, Zimmermann HD. Preface: Introduction to Special Section - Business Models. Electronics Markets.2001;11(1): 3-9 [DOI:10.1080/10196780151105302]
14. Afuah A, Tucci CL. Internet business models and strategies. 2nd Ed.New york: MacGrow-Hill Press.2003
15. MandićA, Mrnjavac Ž, Kordić L. Tourism infrastructure,recreational facilities and tourism development. Tourism and Hospitality Management. 2018;24:41-62. [DOI:10.20867/thm.24.1.12]
16. Heung V, Kucukusta D, Song H. A Conceptual model of medical tourism:implications for future research. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2010;27(3):236-251. [DOI:10.1080/10548401003744677]
17. Gan L, Frederick JR. Medical tourism facilitators: Patterns of service differentiation. Journal of Vacation Marketing. 2011;17(3):165-183. [DOI:10.1177/1356766711409181]
18. Shafera S, Smitha H, Linder J. The power of business models. Business Horizons,2005;48:199-2007. [DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014]
19. Lunt N, Smith RD, Exworthy M, Green ST, Horsfall DG, Mannion R. Medical Tourism: Treatments, Markets and Health System Implications [internet]. 2010,Available from: http://OECD.Org
20. Sarantopoulos L, Katsoni V , Geitona M. Medical tourism and the role of E-medical tourism intermediaries in Greece. tourismos:An international multidiciplinary journal of tourism,2014;9(2)129-145.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Site Keywords
Health, Administration, Scientific Article, Iran University of Medical Sciences,
