Volume 21, Issue 74 (1-2019)
jha 2019, 21(74): 35-50 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Alinezhad Chamazacoti F, Mirhaghjoo Langerudi S. Scientific Collaboration Networks of the Researchers of the Journal of Health Administration: A Scientometric study, 2013-2017. jha 2019; 21 (74) :35-50
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2780-en.html
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2780-en.html
1- Department of Scientometrics Islamic Studies and Humanities, Regional Information Center for Science and Technology, Iran; Corresponding Author (alinezhad@isc.gov.ir) , alinezhad@isc.gov.ir
2- Department of Scientometrics Islamic Studies and Humanities, Regional Information Center for Science and Technology, Iran
2- Department of Scientometrics Islamic Studies and Humanities, Regional Information Center for Science and Technology, Iran
Abstract: (4819 Views)
Introduction: Reputable academic journals are known as the driving force behind the development of societies. In the meantime, scientific communication is considered as the most important and effective tool for the development of science and knowledge in the information society. The Journal of Health Administration is the second most popular journal in Iran, due to its impact factor in the field of medical sciences; therefore, the present study aimed to explore and illustrate the scientific collaboration networks of its researchers from a scientometric perspective.
Methods: This study is a scientometrics- applied research. The corpus of the study included 165 articles published in the Journal of Health Administration from 2013 to 2017. USINET software was used to Visualize and analyze the Co-authorship networks, and VOS viewer software was utilized to visualize density Maps.
Results: According to the findings, the group work was welcomed by the researchers and the scientific collaboration was high. It was shown that Rezapour, Sayedin, Bagheri Faradneboe, Abolghasem Gorji, and Nouri Motlagh had the highest density of co-authorship in the network. An analysis of the co-authorship network of collaborating universities showed Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, and Shahid Beheshti University as the centers of excellence.
Conclusion: The researchers of this journal have a great tendency towards scientific collaboration and account for 94 percent of the journal articles.
Methods: This study is a scientometrics- applied research. The corpus of the study included 165 articles published in the Journal of Health Administration from 2013 to 2017. USINET software was used to Visualize and analyze the Co-authorship networks, and VOS viewer software was utilized to visualize density Maps.
Results: According to the findings, the group work was welcomed by the researchers and the scientific collaboration was high. It was shown that Rezapour, Sayedin, Bagheri Faradneboe, Abolghasem Gorji, and Nouri Motlagh had the highest density of co-authorship in the network. An analysis of the co-authorship network of collaborating universities showed Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, and Shahid Beheshti University as the centers of excellence.
Conclusion: The researchers of this journal have a great tendency towards scientific collaboration and account for 94 percent of the journal articles.
Keywords: Social network analysis, Journal of Health Administration, Scientific collaboration, Scientific map, Scientometrics, Visualization
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2018/07/31 | Accepted: 2019/01/23 | Published: 2019/01/23
Received: 2018/07/31 | Accepted: 2019/01/23 | Published: 2019/01/23
References
1. Hudson J. Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives.1996; 10(3): 158-153. [DOI:10.1257/jep.10.3.153]
2. Kuzhabekova A. Impact of co-authorship strategies on research productivity: a social network analysis of publications in russia cardiology university of minnesota[Internet]. 2011[cited 2018 May 18]. Available from:http//www/conservancy.umn.edu.
3. Khasseh A A, Fakhar M, Soosaraei M, Sadeghi S. Present situation of scientific productions of Iranian researchers in parasitology domain in ISI databases. Iran J Med Microbiol. 2011; 5 (1 & 2) :65-53. [In Persian]
4. Parhamnia F, Nooshinfard F, Hariri N, Mohamad Esmaeil S. The effect of behavioral factors on scientific communication. An Analysis Based on Multiple Regressions. 2018;28(2): 106-85. [In Persian]
5. Parhamnia F, Nooshinfard F, Hariri N, Mohamad Esmaeil S . The structural factors affecting the scholarly communication and scientfic products in iran's universities. Library and Information Science Reaserch. 2017; 7(1):72-48. [In Persian]
6. Erfanmanesh M. The impact of international research collaboration on the quality of scholarly output of tehran university of medical sciences. Journal of Health Administration. 2017; 20(69):56-42. [In Persian]
7. Arshadi H, Erfanmanesh M, Salami N. Visualization and analysis of co-authorship networks of the shahid behehsti university researchers in humanities. Social Sciences and Art. 2017; 3(5):70-48. [In Persian]
8. Sajadiyan M, Mohammadi A. Analyze and map the structure of scientific network of co-authorship (co-authorship) and co-operation network. In: Bahari MR, editor. Proceedings of 18th Marine Industry Conference; 2016 Oct 18-19; Kish, Iran. Tehran. Iranian Association of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. 2016. P. 32-14. [In Persian]
9. Biglu M, Abotalebi P. Co-authorship networks in the field of library and information science2006-2016. Knowledge Studies. 2017;3(9):20-1. [In Persian]
10. Garayi A, Basirian Jahromi R. Drawing up a co-authored network of researchers in the field of information science and science using social network analysis indicators. A case study Journal of Librarianship and Information .2013; 16(3):101-121. [In Persian]
11. Erfanmanesh M, Hosseini E. 10 Years of the international Journal of Information Science and Management: a scientometric and social network analysis study, Journal of Information Science and Management. 2014;3(11):1-14. [In Persian]
12. Wang T, Zhang Q, Liu Z, Liu W, Wen D. On social computing research collaboration patterns: A social network perspective. Frontiers of Computer Science in China. 2012; 6:130-122.
13. Yan E, Ding Y, Zhu Q. Mapping library and information science in China: A coauthorship network analysis. Scientometrics .2010;83(1): 151-131. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-009-0027-9]
14. Borgatti SP, Everett MG. A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 2006. 61(1): 32-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.11.005]
15. Sedghi Sh, Mousakhani Gh, Talachi H. Citation analysis and scientific mapping of Iranian researchers' publications in stem cell indexed in science citation index up to 2015. Journal of Health Administration .2017;19(66):19-7. [In Persian].
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Site Keywords
Health, Administration, Scientific Article, Iran University of Medical Sciences,
