Volume 27, Issue 1 (10-2024)                   jha 2024, 27(1): 85-98 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Asadi H, Kolivand P, Ahangar A, Khakian M, Dostiari A, Beheshti R. Requirements for Implementation of Diagnostic Related Groups (DRG) Plan in Iran: A Qualitative study. jha 2024; 27 (1) :85-98
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4318-en.html
1- Department of Health Economics, Shahed University, Tehran
2- Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
3- Secretary, Ministry of Education, Tehran
4- employee, Ministry of Health, Tehran , rezabeheshti385@gmail.com
Abstract:   (235 Views)
Introduction: Policymakers in each country must decide on the financing and payment system for healthcare. In addition to increasing efficiency and effectiveness, this system should reduce individuals’ out-of-pocket payments. One such system that has shown positive results globally is Diagnostic Related Groups (DRG). This study aims to identify the requirements for the implementation of DRG in Iran.
Methods: This research is a qualitative study employing conventional content analysis, conducted during 2021-2022. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The participnats included senior managers with at least five years of experience working in insurance organizations, the budget unit, or medical economics of the Ministry of Health or hospitals, as well as faculty members with experience in research related to payment methods. The participnats were selected based on specific criteria. After conducting 14 interviews, data saturation was achieved. The data were then analyzed using MAXQDA10 software.
Results: The most important requirements for the implementation of DRG in Iran included regulatory/executive requirements, informing and accompanying stakeholders, technical and informational infrastructures, and 10 related sub-themes.
Conclusion: For the successful implementation of the DRG system in Iran, policymakers and health system managers can leverage the experiences of other countries, train healthcare providers, calculate accurate costs, improve the accounting system, provide necessary software, develop diagnostic groups, set proportionate tariffs, and strengthen information systems. These steps will help remove implementation obstacles, attract stakeholder cooperation, and prepare the necessary technical and informational infrastructures.
Full-Text [PDF 948 kb]   (149 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health Economics
Received: 2024/03/23 | Accepted: 2024/06/19 | Published: 2024/12/14

References
1. Roberts MJ, Hsiao W, Berman P, Reich MR. Getting health reform right: A guide to improving performance and equity. London: Oxford University Press.
2. Mohammadi-Sefiddashti F, Mohammadi H, Rezayatmand R. The trend of financial resources structure of selected hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: 2011-2021. Journal of Health Administration. 2024; 26 (3) :164-179. Available from:http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1_4436-fa.html
3. Heydaryan N, Vahdat S. Effect of health sector evolution on pay out of pocket, in selected public hospitals in Isfahan. Journal of Medical Council of Iran 2015;33(3):187-94. http://jmciri.ir/article-1-1788-fa.html. [In Persian]
4. Mehrara M, Fazaeli A. A study on health expenditures in relation with economics growth in Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries.GHA. 2009;12(35):49-60. Available from: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-364-fa.html .[In Persian]
5. Central-Bank-of-Islamic-Republic-of-Iran. Economic Time Series Database 2022. Available from: https://tsd.cbi.ir/Display/Content.aspx. [In Persian]
6. Ghiasvand H, Hadian M, Maleki MR, Shabaninejad H. Determinants of catastrophic medical payments in hospitals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences 2009. GHA. 2010;13(3):145-54. Available from: https://hakim.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?cur=1&slc_lang=en&sid=1. [In Persian]
7. Safari M, Mazroui Nasrabadi E. The future study of service-based financing in the healthcare supply chain. GHA. 2024; 26 (3) :29-49. Available from: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4354-fa.html. [In Persian].
8. Seyyedabadi M-R. Development of the global payment system (prospective payment) by analyzing the cost of heart surgery records with the purpose of managing the treatment resources of a case study in Iran. Tehran: Payame Noor University; 2019 . [In Persian]
9. Ahmadvand A. Getting health sector reform. Tehran: Ibn-e-sina; 2003.[In Persian]
10. Doshmangir L, Rashidian A, Takian A, Doshmangir P, Mostafavi H. Payment system of urban family physician programme in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Is it appropriate? East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(7):611-617. https://doi.org/10.26719/2018.24.7.611 [DOI:10.26719/2018.24.7.611. [In Persian]]
11. Busse R. Do Diagnosis‐Related Groups explain variations in hospital costs and length of stay?-Analyses from the EuroDRG project for 10 episodes of care across 10 European countries. Health Econ. 2012; 21(Suppl. 2):1-5. [DOI:10.1002/hec.2861]
12. Mayes R. The origins, development, and passage of Medicare's revolutionary prospective payment system. J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. 2007 Jan 1;62(1):21-55. [DOI:10.1093/jhmas/jrj038]
13. Busse R, Geissler A, Aaviksoo A, Cots F, Häkkinen U, Kobel C, et al. Diagnosis related groups in Europe: Moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals? BMJ. 2013;346:1-20. doi: [DOI:10.1136/bmj.f3197]
14. Naderi M. Introduction to diagnosis related groups. Tehran: Armaghan; 2020. [In Persian]
15. Mathauer I, Wittenbecher F. DRG-based payment systems in low-and middle-income countries: Implementation experiences and challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/75150
16. Zolfaghari Z. E-visit payment system based on diagnosis related groups in Iran and the world: A comparative study. Third Congress of Iranian Telemedicine; Tehran. Tehran: Iranian Telemedicine Association; 2020. p. 1-5 . [In Persian]
17. Barouni M, Ahmadian L, Anari HS, Mohsenbeigi E. Challenges and adverse outcomes of implementing reimbursement mechanisms based on the Diagnosis-Related Group Classification System: A systematic review. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2020;20(3):e260-70. [DOI:10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.004]
18. Ghaffari S, Doran C, Wilson A, Aisbett C. Trialling diagnosis-related groups classification in the Iranian health system: A case study examining the feasibility of introducing casemix. EMHJ. 2010;16(5):460-6. [DOI:10.26719/2010.16.5.460]
19. Rampisheh Z, Kameli ME, Zarei J, Barzaki AV, Meraji M, Mohammadi A. Developing a national minimum data set for hospital information systems in the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2020;26(4):400-9. Available from: http://www/emro.who.int/emhj.htm [DOI:10.26719/emhj.19.046]
20. Aryankhesal A, Sheldon TA, Mannion R, Mahdipour S. The dysfunctional consequences of a performance measurement system:The case of the Iranian national hospital grading programme. Journal of Health Services & Policy. 2015;20(3):138-45. [DOI:10.1177/1355819615576252]
21. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research.2005;15(9):1277-88. [DOI:10.1177/1049732305276687]
22. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. JAN. 2008;62(1):107-15. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x]
23. Rodrigues JM, Paviot BT, Martin C. DRG Information system, healthcare reforms and innovation of management in the western countries during the 90s: Where are the key success factors? Case Mix. 2002;4(1):16-21. Available from: http://www.casemix.org/pubbl/pdf/4_1_3.pdf
24. Ghaffari Sh, Abolhallaj M, Pouragha B. Feasibility of implementing diagnosis related groups: A case study in Iran's hospitals. Hakim Research Journal. 2012; 15(2): 147- 57. Available from: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1026-en.html. [In Persian]
25. Oppi C, Campanale C, Cinquini L, Vagnoni E. Clinicians and accounting: A systematic review and research directions. Financial Accountability & Management.2019;35(3):290-312. [DOI:10.1111/faam.12195]
26. Bozarjomehri H, Mokhtaripayam M, Chivaei D, Almasi M, Parnian E. Example of conflict of interest: Conflict of interest in health sector. Tehran: Islamic Parliament Research Center (IPRC); 2021 https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1668525. [In Persian]
27. Latta VB, Helbing C. Medicare: Short-stay hospital services, by leading diagnosis-related groups, 1983 and 1985. Health care financing review. 1988;10(2):79.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192922/
28. Roszita I, Nur AM, AR SZ, Aljunid SM. Estimation of cost of diagnostic laboratory services using activity based costing (ABC) for implementation of Malaysia diagnosis related group (MY-DRG) in teaching hospital. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine.PHM. 2017 Jan 1;17(2):P.1-8.
29. Devaraj S, Ow TT, Kohli R. Examining the impact of information technology and patient flow on healthcare performance: A Theory of Swift and Even Flow (TSEF) perspective. Journal of Operations Management. 2013 May 1;31(4):181-92. [DOI:10.1016/j.jom.2013.03.001]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Health Administration

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb