Volume 26, Issue 1 (3-2023)
jha 2023, 26(1): 67-89 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mosadeghrad A M, Ranjbar Hamghavandi M H, Mohsenian A, Metanat S, Bordbar S. Managing conflict of interests in Iran's family medicine program: A scoping review. jha 2023; 26 (1) :67-89
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4249-en.html
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-4249-en.html
Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad1 
, Mohammad Hossein Ranjbar Hamghavandi2 , Alireza Mohsenian3 , Sepehr Metanat4 , Sanaz Bordbar 5
, Mohammad Hossein Ranjbar Hamghavandi2 , Alireza Mohsenian3 , Sepehr Metanat4 , Sanaz Bordbar 5
1- Professor, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
2- MD. Student, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
3- School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- MD. Student, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran ,sanazbrd1381@gmail.com
2- MD. Student, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
3- School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5- MD. Student, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran ,
Abstract: (1081 Views)
Introduction: Family medicine is a program in which the family physician and his team members are responsible for providing comprehensive, coordinated, continuous, and individual and family-based health services to promote, restore, or maintain health in a community. Iran's urban family medicine program was initiated in 2011 and conflict of interest (COI) is a challenge to its effective implementation. This research aimed to identify the types and examples of COI in family medicine programs and to present solutions to control it.
Methods: This study was carried out using the scoping review method. All articles and documents published in six databases (i.e., Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, SID, Magiran, and Noormags) and Google Scholar search engine in the field of COI in family medicine program between January 1980 and July 2022 were searched. Finally, 31 related documents were selected and analyzed using the framework analysis method.
Results: Overall, 18 examples of COI were identified in the family medicine program, which were divided into two categories: direct and indirect COI. Receiving money, gifts, samples, and grants from pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies has been cited more in the literature. Furthermore, 28 solutions for managing conflict of interests were identified and categorized into four levels: Meta (government and the Ministry of Health), macro (medical universities, health insurance companies and pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies), meso (health organizations) and micro (health services provider and receiver). Developing rules and regulations, using performance-based payment methods, monitoring and controlling the performance of family doctors, clarifying the financial relations of family doctors with industries, using an evidence-based educational system, and enhancing family doctors’ knowledge and skills were cited in the literature.
Conclusion: Conflict of interest is a serious challenge in primary health care and family medicine program which may lead to corruption. Conflict of interest strategies should be implemented at the individual, organizational, and national levels to be effective. A system must be created to increase the cost of COI to individuals.
Methods: This study was carried out using the scoping review method. All articles and documents published in six databases (i.e., Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, SID, Magiran, and Noormags) and Google Scholar search engine in the field of COI in family medicine program between January 1980 and July 2022 were searched. Finally, 31 related documents were selected and analyzed using the framework analysis method.
Results: Overall, 18 examples of COI were identified in the family medicine program, which were divided into two categories: direct and indirect COI. Receiving money, gifts, samples, and grants from pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies has been cited more in the literature. Furthermore, 28 solutions for managing conflict of interests were identified and categorized into four levels: Meta (government and the Ministry of Health), macro (medical universities, health insurance companies and pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies), meso (health organizations) and micro (health services provider and receiver). Developing rules and regulations, using performance-based payment methods, monitoring and controlling the performance of family doctors, clarifying the financial relations of family doctors with industries, using an evidence-based educational system, and enhancing family doctors’ knowledge and skills were cited in the literature.
Conclusion: Conflict of interest is a serious challenge in primary health care and family medicine program which may lead to corruption. Conflict of interest strategies should be implemented at the individual, organizational, and national levels to be effective. A system must be created to increase the cost of COI to individuals.
Type of Study: Review |
Subject:
Health Services Management
Received: 2022/12/12 | Accepted: 2023/03/18 | Published: 2023/07/26
Received: 2022/12/12 | Accepted: 2023/03/18 | Published: 2023/07/26
References
1. World Health Organization. Declaration of alma-ata. Regional Office for Europe: Denmark, Copenhagen; 1978. p. 4.
2. Mosadeghrad A, Aarabi M, Abbasi M. Family practice: A conceptual review. Hakim. 2021;24(2):172-91. [In Persian]
3. Mobasheri F, Jafarzadeh S, Bahramali E. The level of satisfaction of family physician program in urban population of Fasa from 2014 to 2015. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2017;7(2):190-8. [In Persian]
4. Kabir MJ, Ashrafian Amiri H, Rabiee M, Keshavarzi A, Hoseini S, Nasrollahpour Shirvani D. Health care providers, satisfaction in the urban family physician program of Iran. Nursing And Midwifery Journal. 2018;16(2):92-100. [in Persian]
5. Damari B, Vosough Moghaddam A, Rostami Gooran N, Kabir MJ. Evaluation of the urban family physician and referral system program in Fars and Mazandran provinces: History, achievements, challenges and solutions. J Sch Publ Health Inst Publ Health Res. 2016;14(2):17-38. [In Persian]
6. Behzadifar M, Behzadifar M, Heidarvand S, Gorji HA, Aryankhesal A, Taheri Moghadam Sh, et al. The challenges of the family physician policy in Iran: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative researches. Fam Pract. 2018 ;35(6): 652-60. [DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmy035]
7. Fardid M, Jafari M, Vosoogh Moghaddam A, Ravaghi H. Challenges and strengths of implementing urban family physician program in Fars province. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:1-8.
8. Mosadeghrad AM. Managing conflict of interest in health sector: A letter to the editor. Tehran University Medical Journal. 2022;80(10):847-8. [In Persian]
9. Field MJ, Lo B, editors. Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
10. Mosadeghrad AM, Ferlie E. Total quality management in healthcare. In: Ortenblad A, Abrahamson Lofstrom C, Sheaff R, editors. Management innovations for healthcare organizations: adopt, abandon or adapt? New York: Routledge; 2016. p. 378-96.
11. Mosadeghrad AM. Comments on Iran hospital accreditation system. Iran J Public Health. 2016; 45(6):837-9.
12. Campbell EG, Gruen RL, Mountford J, Miller LG, Cleary PD, Blumenthal D. A national survey of physician-industry relationships. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(17):1742-50. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa064508]
13. Kaiser Family Foundation. National survey of physicians part II: Doctors and prescription drugs. Menlo Park, CA: KFF; 2002. 9 p.
14. Morgan MA, Dana J, Loewenstein G, Zinberg S, Schulkin J. Interactions of doctors with the pharmaceutical industry. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(10):559-63. [DOI:10.1136/jme.2005.014480]
15. Neyazi N, Mosadeghrad AM, Afshari M, Isfahani P, Safi N. Strategies to tackle non-communicable diseases in Afghanistan: A scoping review. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1-15. [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.982416]
16. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. [DOI:10.1080/1364557032000119616]
17. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess B, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 187-208.
18. Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J, Kearon C, Crowther M, Gutterman D, et al. The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: A potential solution. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):738-41. [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00254]
19. Hensley S, Martinez B. To sell their drugs, companies increasingly rely on doctors. Wall St J (East Ed). 2005.
20. Rosenthal E. Drug makers' push leads to vaccines' fast rise. New York Times. 2008:A1.
21. Wazana A. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: Is a gift ever just a gift? JAMA. 2000;283(3):373-80. [DOI:10.1001/jama.283.3.373]
22. Sandberg WS, Carlos R, Sandberg EH, Roizen MF. The effect of educational gifts from pharmaceutical firms on medical students' recall of company names or products. Acad Med. 1997;72(10):916-8. [DOI:10.1097/00001888-199710000-00024]
23. Alper PR. Primary care in transition. JAMA. 1994;272(19):1523-7. [DOI:10.1001/jama.1994.03520190069037]
24. Ghiasipour M, Mosadeghrad AM, Arab M, Jaafaripooyan E. Leadership challenges in health care organizations: The case of Iranian hospitals. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:1-8. [DOI:10.14196/mjiri.31.96]
25. Esfahani P, Mosadeghrad AM, Akbarisari A. The success of strategic planning in health care organizations of Iran. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018;31(6):563-74. [DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2017-0145]
26. Chimonas S, Rothman DJ. New federal guidelines for physician-pharmaceutical industry relations: The politics of policy formation. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(4):949-60. [DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.949]
27. Bodenheimer T, Berenson RA, Rudolf P. The primary care-specialty income gap: Why it matters. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4):301-6. [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00011]
28. Mosadeghrad AM, Isfahani P. Strategies for reducing induced demand in the health system: A scoping review. Journal of Health Administration. 2023;25(4):45-68.
29. National Health Service England. Managing conflicts of interest in the NHS. 2017. [DOI:10.1136/bmj.j1590]
30. Fischer MA, Keough ME, Baril JL, Saccoccio L, Mazor KM, Ladd E, et al. Prescribers and pharmaceutical representatives: Why are we still meeting? J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(7):795-801. [DOI:10.1007/s11606-009-0989-6]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Site Keywords
Health, Administration, Scientific Article, Iran University of Medical Sciences,
