Volume 22, Issue 1 (3-2019)
jha 2019, 22(1): 103-118 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
mahmoudi V, Feizpour M A, Amoozad Mahdiraji H, dehmoubed sharifabadi B. Designing a Model for Assessing the Sustainable Supply Chain Performance of Governmental Hospitals using Grounded Theory Approach. jha 2019; 22 (1) :103-118
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2934-en.html
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2934-en.html
1- Faculty of management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran,
3- Faculty of management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran,
4- Manufacturing and Operations Management, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus ,dehmoobed@ut.ac.ir
2- Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran,
3- Faculty of management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran,
4- Manufacturing and Operations Management, University of Tehran, Kish International Campus ,
Abstract: (5824 Views)
Abstract
Introduction: Designing a supply chain performance model for hospitals is one of the fundamental decisions in supply chain management which significantly affect the investment return and the overall performance in the chain. The purpose of this research was to design a model for assessing supply chain performance in hospitals while considering economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability.
Methods: This qualitative research was conducted using grounded theory. In order to collect data, 14 experts in public hospitals in Yazd province were interviewed. The participants included five hospital managers, four heads of departments, three supplies deputies, and two administrative heads who had at least 8 years of work experience and were familiar with sustainability issues. A combination of purposeful and snowball techniques was used to collect data which were then analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding methods.
Results: After the analysis of the data, 44 sub-codes affecting the sustainability of supply chain in public hospital were identified. The sub-codes were then classified into six main codes: intervening factors, causal factors, phenomenal pivot, performance strategies, background requirements and performance implications. Improving collaborative cooperation in different parts of hospitals, reducing the risk of medical errors, improving the quality of services, and enhancing the professional status of personnel were some of the implications of assessing the sustainable supply chain performance in hospitals.
Conclusion: The proposed model can be used as a tool of prediction and policy making while assessing sustainability of supply chain performance in public hospitals. Planning and policymaking to enhance health and environmental management system can lead to collaborations between departments, reduction in medical errors (i.e., wrong diagnosis or medication), understanding the specific needs of each patient, the implementation of educational and health care programs, as well as a reduction of environmental pollutants.
Introduction: Designing a supply chain performance model for hospitals is one of the fundamental decisions in supply chain management which significantly affect the investment return and the overall performance in the chain. The purpose of this research was to design a model for assessing supply chain performance in hospitals while considering economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability.
Methods: This qualitative research was conducted using grounded theory. In order to collect data, 14 experts in public hospitals in Yazd province were interviewed. The participants included five hospital managers, four heads of departments, three supplies deputies, and two administrative heads who had at least 8 years of work experience and were familiar with sustainability issues. A combination of purposeful and snowball techniques was used to collect data which were then analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding methods.
Results: After the analysis of the data, 44 sub-codes affecting the sustainability of supply chain in public hospital were identified. The sub-codes were then classified into six main codes: intervening factors, causal factors, phenomenal pivot, performance strategies, background requirements and performance implications. Improving collaborative cooperation in different parts of hospitals, reducing the risk of medical errors, improving the quality of services, and enhancing the professional status of personnel were some of the implications of assessing the sustainable supply chain performance in hospitals.
Conclusion: The proposed model can be used as a tool of prediction and policy making while assessing sustainability of supply chain performance in public hospitals. Planning and policymaking to enhance health and environmental management system can lead to collaborations between departments, reduction in medical errors (i.e., wrong diagnosis or medication), understanding the specific needs of each patient, the implementation of educational and health care programs, as well as a reduction of environmental pollutants.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Health Services Management
Received: 2019/01/5 | Accepted: 2019/09/24 | Published: 2019/09/24
Received: 2019/01/5 | Accepted: 2019/09/24 | Published: 2019/09/24
References
1. Toba S, Tomasini M, Yang Y. Supply chain management in hospital: A case study. California Journal of Operations Management, 2008; 6(1): 49-55.
2. Moons k, Waeyenbergh G, Pintelon L. Measuring the logistics performance of internal hospital supply chains - a literature study. The International Journal of Management Science. 2018; 10(54): 1-13.
3. De Vries J, Huijsman R. Supply chain management in health services: an overview. Supply Chain Management. 2011; 16(3): 159-165. [DOI:10.1108/13598541111127146]
4. Brandenburg M, Govindan K, Sarkis J, Seuring S. Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research. 2014; 233(2): 299-312. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032]
5. Lenin K. Measuring supply chain performance in the healthcare industry. Science Journal of Business and Management. 2014; 2(5): 136-142. [DOI:10.11648/j.sjbm.20140205.14]
6. Azadi M, Jafarian M, Farzipoor Saen R, Mirhedayatian S M. A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers & Operations Research. 2015; 54(2): 274-285. [DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2014.03.002]
7. Teuteberg F, Wittstruck D. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management research: What is there and what is missing?. Accounting and Information Systems. 2010; 1001-1015.
8. Ahi P, Searcy C. Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: A triple bottom line approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2015; 39(10): 2882-2896. [DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2014.10.055]
9. Turker D, Altuntas C. Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry : An analysis of corporate reports. European Management Journal. 2014; 32(5): 837-849. [DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2014.02.001]
10. Popovic T, Kraslawski A, Barbosa-Póvoa A, Carvalho A. Quantitative indicators of social sustainability assessment and product responsibility aspects of supply chains. Journal of International Studies. 2017; 10(4): 9-36. [DOI:10.14254/2071-8330.2017/10-4/1]
11. Behzad B, Moraga J R, Chen S. Modelling healthcare internal service supply chains for the analysis of medication delivery errors and amplification effects. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 2011; 4(4): 554-576. [DOI:10.3926/jiem.201]
12. Eleyan D, Al-Khatib I, Garfield J. System dynamics model for hospital waste characterization and generation in developing countries. Waste Management & Research. 2013; 31(10): 986-995. [DOI:10.1177/0734242X13490981]
13. Mustaffa N H, Potter A. Healthcare supply chain management in Malaysia: a case study. Supply Chain Management. 2009; 14(3): 234 - 243. [DOI:10.1108/13598540910954575]
14. Zailani S, Jeyaraman K, Vengadasan G, Premkumar R. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey. International Journal of Production Economics. 2012; 140(3): 330-340. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008]
15. Roman D J, Osinski M, Erdmann R H. The construction process of grounded theory in administration. Contaduríay Administración. 2017; 62(3): 985-1000. [DOI:10.1016/j.cya.2016.06.012]
16. Hussain M, Khan M, Al-Aomar A. A framework for supply chain sustainability in service industry with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016; 55(3): 1301-1312. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.097]
17. Seuring S, Müller M. Core issues in sustainable supply chain management - a Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2008; 17(8): 455-466. [DOI:10.1002/bse.607]
18. Liu W, Bai E, Liu L, Wei W. A framework of sustainable service supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of sustainability. 2017; 9(3): 421-446. [DOI:10.3390/su9030421]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Site Keywords
Health, Administration, Scientific Article, Iran University of Medical Sciences,
