Volume 22, Issue 1 (3-2019)                   jha 2019, 22(1): 12-25 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Moghaddam A, Shafiei Nikabadi M, Kashefi M. The relationship between physicians' capabilities and their attitude to change and their willingness to accept telemedicine technology. jha. 2019; 22 (1) :12-25
URL: http://jha.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2822-en.html
1- Faculty of Economics and Management, Semnan University, Iran , moghaddam@semnan.ac.ir
2- Faculty of Economics and Management, Semnan University, Iran
Abstract:   (698 Views)
Introduction: The extent and distribution of population across the country has made telemedicine technology an effective and comprehensive way to provide health services by physicians. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the capabilities of physicians and their willingness to accept telemedicine technology.
Methods: The population of this analytical-survey study, consists of physicians in Amiralmomenin Therapeutic Research Training Center, Semnan. A questionnaire was used to collect data which were then analyzed using SPSS 19 and SMARTPLS 2 (beta) to test the research hypotheses .
Results: There was a statistically significant positive and direct relationship between the managerial [path coefficient: 0.141] and technical [path coefficient: 0.135] capabilities of physicians and their willingness to accept telemedical technology. In addition, managerial [path coefficient: 0.335] and financial [path coefficient: 0.211] capabilities have an indirect and significant effect on the degree of willingness to accept telemedicine technology through strengthening the physicians’ viewpoint about the change. [path coefficient: 0.301.]
Conclusion: It is recommended that health care administrators and managers of medical education centers, prior to the implementation of telemedicine medical services and investment in related hardware, increase the capabilities of physicians through strengthening their abilities in management, working with information and communications technology, finance and investment. This will improve the attitude of physicians towards change, and facilitates the acceptance of technology.
Full-Text [PDF 1216 kb]   (188 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2018/09/15 | Accepted: 2019/09/24 | Published: 2019/09/24

References
1. Wong A, Wouterse B, Slobbe LCJ, Boshuizen HC, Polder JJ. Medical innovation and age-specific trends in health care utilization: Findings and implications. Social Science & Medicine. 2012;74(2):263-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.026]
2. Zanaboni P, Wootton R. Adoption of telemedicine: from pilot stage to routine delivery. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2012;12(1):1-10. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6947-12-1]
3. Nemati MJ. TeleMedicine; Necessity of Iran's vast Geography. Online Health Report on the use of ICT in the health field. [Online] 2016 May.. [Cited 2016 May 1]; Available from: URL: http://www.salamatonline.ir/news/5252.. [In Persian]
4. Global Telemedicine Market-Growth, Trends, and Forecasts. [2016-2021] Mordor Intelligence Reports. [Online]. [Cited 2016 May 7]; Available from: URL: http://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-telemedicine-market-industry.
5. Yellowlees PM. Successfully developing a telemedicine system. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2005;11(7):331-5. [DOI:10.1258/135763305774472024]
6. Segrelles-Calvo G, Chiner E, Fernández-Fabrellas E. Acceptance of Telemedicine among Healthcare Professionals. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015;51(12):611-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.arbres.2015.08.002]
7. Davidson E, Heslinga D. Bridging the IT adoption gap for small physician practices: an action research study on electronic health records. Inf Syst Manag. 2007; 24(1):15-28. [DOI:10.1080/10580530601036786]
8. Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Services Res. 2010;10(1):231. [DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-231]
9. Victoria A, Wade, Jaklin A, Eliott, and Janet E Hiller. Clinician Acceptance is the Key Factor for Sustainable Telehealth Services. Qualitative Health Research. 2014;24(5):682-94. [DOI:10.1177/1049732314528809]
10. Rho MJ, Choi I, Lee J. Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2014;83(8):559-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005]
11. Brebner J A, Brebner E M, Ruddick-Bracken H. Experience-based guidelines for the implementation of telemedicine services‌. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2005;11(suppl 1):3-5. [DOI:10.1258/1357633054461778]
12. Hopp F, Whitten P, Subramanian U, Woodbridge P. Perspectives from the Veterans Health Administration about opportunities and barriers in telemedicine‌. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2006;12(8):404-09. [DOI:10.1258/135763306779378717]
13. Yu P, Li H, Gagnon MP. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities. A cross-sectional survey Int. J Med Inform. 2009;78(4):219-29. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.006]
14. Bagozzi R. The legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2007;8(1):244-54. [DOI:10.17705/1jais.00122]
15. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review. 2007;64(6):650-72. [DOI:10.1177/1077558707305942]
16. Holden R, Karsh B. The Technology Acceptance Model: its past and future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002]
17. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inform. & Ma. 2002;39(4):297-11. [DOI:10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00098-2]
18. Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35(1):982-1003. [DOI:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982]
19. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decis Sci. 1996;27(3): 451-81. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x]
20. Shih YY. The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage. Behav Inform Technol. 2006;25(5): 407-11. [DOI:10.1080/01449290500168103]
21. Thong JY L, Hong W, Tam KY. Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2002;57(3): 215-42. [DOI:10.1016/S1071-5819(02)91024-4]
22. Hsu MK, Wang SW, Chiu KK. Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Comput Hum Behav. 2009;25(2): 412-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.003]
23. Fathian M, Mahdavi Nour S H. Basics and Information Technology Management. Tenth Edition. Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology; 2006.. [In Persian]
24. Figueiredo P N. Learning processes features and technological capability-accumulation: explaining inter-firm differences. Technovation. 2002;22(11): 685-98. [DOI:10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00068-2]
25. Wu JH, Chen YC, Greenes RA. Healthcare technology management competency and its impacts on IT-healthcare partnerships development‌. International journal of medical informatics. 2009;78(2):71-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.05.007]
26. Van Rooij MC, Lusardi A, Alessie RJ. Financial literacy and retirement planning in the Netherlands‌. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2011;32(4):593-608. [DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.004]
27. Garg A, Shukla B, Kendall G. Barriers to implementation of IT in educational institutions. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. 2015;32(2):94-108. [DOI:10.1108/IJILT-11-2014-0026]
28. Tabibi S J, Riahi L, Yousefinejad T. Evaluation of managers of educational hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences using 360 degree feedback model. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2013;12(9):709-18.. [In Persian]
29. Moghimi M, Ramazan M. Management Research, Business Management. Vol 7. First ed. Tehran: Rahdan Publishing; 2011.. [In Persian]
30. Dunham RB, Grube JA, Gardner DG, Cummings LL, Pierce JL. The development of an attitude toward change instrument. Meeting Strategic Management Research Center. Washington, DC: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; 1989.
31. Davari A, Rezazadeh A. Structural Equation Modeling with PLS. Tehran: Jahad-e Daneshgahi Press; 2013.. [In Persian]
32. Sobhanifard Y. The Basics and Application of Factor Analysis and Modeling of Structural Equations. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Press; 2016.. [In Persian]
33. Hung SY, Ku YC, Chie JC. Understanding physicians' acceptance of the Medline system for practicing evidence-based medicine: A decomposed TPB model. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(2):130-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.009]
34. Taylor J, Coates E, Brewster L, Mountain G, Wessels B, Haw-ley MS. Examining the use of telehealth in community nursing: identifying the factors affecting frontline staff acceptance and telehealth adoption. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(1):326-37. [DOI:10.1111/jan.12480]
35. Saigi-Rubió F, Jiménez-Zarco A, Torrent-Sellens J. Determinants of the intention to use telemedicine: evidence from primary care physicians. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32(1):29-36. [DOI:10.1017/S0266462316000015]
36. Paul Jen Hwa Hu, Patrick YK, Chau, Olivia R, Liu Sheng. Adoption of Telemedicine Technology by Health Care Organizations: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 2009;12(3):197-221. [DOI:10.1207/S15327744JOCE1203_01]
37. Sanayei A, Khazaei Pool J, Jafari S, Balouei Jamkhaneh H. Analyzing of Factors that Affect the Acceptance of Telemedicine with Combination of Technology Adoption and Theory of Planned Behavior Models. [Case study: Physicians in Isfahan City] Health Inf Manage. 2013;10(4): 571-580.. [In Persian]
38. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Ma Sci. 2000;46(2):186-204. [DOI:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926]
39. Wilson EV, Lankton NK. Modeling Patients' Acceptance of Provider-delivered E-health, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004;11(4):241-48. [DOI:10.1197/jamia.M1475]
40. Saigi-Rubió F, Torrent-Sellens J, Jiménez-Zarco A. Drivers of telemedicine use: comparative evidence from samples of Spanish, Colombian and Bolivian physicians. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1): 128. [DOI:10.1186/s13012-014-0128-6]
41. Gutierrez J, Long JA. Reliability and validity of diabetes specific health beliefs model scales in patients with diabetes and serious mental illness. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;92(3): 342-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.018]
42. Angst CM, Agarwal R. Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: the elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly. 2009;3(2): 339-70. [DOI:10.2307/20650295]
43. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. 1991;50(2): 179-211. [DOI:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Health Administration

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb